翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ First National Bank of Brewster ・ First National Bank of Charleroi ・ First National Bank of Charlotte ・ First National Bank of Commerce Building ・ First National Bank of Dubuque ・ First National Bank of Florida ・ First National Bank of Greenville ・ First National Bank of Haxtun ・ First National Bank of Hood River ・ First National Bank of Houlton ・ First National Bank of Lacona ・ First National Bank of Layton ・ First National Bank of Long Beach ・ First National Bank of Mankato ・ First National Bank of Meeteetse ・ First National Bank of Montgomery v. Daly ・ First National Bank of Morrilton ・ First National Bank of Morrisville ・ First National Bank of Omaha ・ First National Bank of Port Jefferson ・ First National Bank of Rochester-Old Monroe County Savings Bank Building ・ First National Bank of Seaford ・ First National Bank of Tanzania ・ First National Bank of White Bear ・ First National Bank South Dakota ・ First National Bank Tower ・ First National Bank-Graham Building ・ First National Building ・ First National Business Park ・ First National Center (Oklahoma City) Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク First National Bank of Montgomery v. Daly ： ウィキペディア英語版 First National Bank of Montgomery v. Daly First National Bank of Montgomery v. Jerome Daly, Dec. 9, 1968 (Justice Court, Credit River Township, Scott County, Minnesota), also known as the Credit River Case, was a case tried before a Justice of the Peace in Minnesota in 1968. The decision in that case is sometimes cited by opponents of the United States banking system. == The trial == An attorney named Jerome Daly was a defendant in a civil case in Credit River Township, Scott County, Minnesota, heard on December 9, 1968. The plaintiff was the First National Bank of Montgomery, which had foreclosed on Daly's property for nonpayment of the mortgage, and was seeking to evict him from the property. Daly based his defense on the argument that the bank had not actually loaned him any money but had simply created credit on its books. Daly argued that the bank had thus not given him anything of value and was not entitled to the property that secured the loan. The jury and the justice of the peace, Martin V. Mahoney, agreed with this argument. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant, and the Justice of the Peace declared that the mortgage was “null and void” and that the bank was not entitled to possession of the property.〔( Judgment and Decree )〕〔(Finding of Facts )〕 The Justice admitted in his order that his decision might run counter to provisions in the Minnesota Constitution and some Minnesota statutes, but contended that such provisions were repugnant to the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights in the Minnesota Constitution. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「First National Bank of Montgomery v. Daly」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.